Reviewer Guide
Thank you for agreeing to review manuscripts submitted to Nomos Ethica. Peer review is an essential process in maintaining the quality, integrity, and academic standards of the journal.
Reviewers are expected to evaluate manuscripts objectively, fairly, and professionally based on the following criteria:
-
Originality and Novelty
Assess whether the manuscript offers new ideas, findings, or contributions relevant to the field of study. -
Relevance to Journal Scope
Ensure that the manuscript is appropriate and aligned with the aims and scope of Nomos Ethica. -
Scientific and Academic Quality
Evaluate the clarity of research objectives, methodology, analysis, discussion, and conclusions. -
Writing and Organization
Review the structure, coherence, readability, and academic language used in the manuscript. -
References and Citations
Check whether references are relevant, up-to-date, and properly cited according to the journal guidelines.
Reviewer Responsibilities
Reviewers are expected to:
-
Maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript during the review process.
-
Provide constructive, objective, and respectful feedback to authors.
-
Complete the review within the specified timeframe.
-
Notify the editor of any conflicts of interest.
-
Refrain from using unpublished materials from the manuscript for personal purposes.
Review Recommendations
At the end of the review, reviewers are requested to provide one of the following recommendations:
-
Accept Submission
-
Revisions Required
-
Resubmit for Review
-
Resubmit Elsewhere
-
Decline Submission
The editorial team of Nomos Ethica sincerely appreciates the valuable contributions of reviewers in supporting the advancement of high-quality academic publications.
