Implementation Of Digital Leadership on The Quality Of E-Government-Based Public Services in Indonesia

Authors

  • Noviani Puspitasari Universitas Tulungagung
  • Uyun Khoridah Universitas Tulungagung
  • Fanida Nur Rahmadiani Universitas Tulungagung
  • Eka Noviana Purwanti Universitas Tulungagung
  • Anang Sugeng Cahyono Universitas Tulungagung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68211/sogpa.v1i2.43

Keywords:

Digital Leadership, E-Government, E-Court

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the Implementation of Digital Leadership in improving the Quality of E-Government-based Public Services through an E-Court Application in Indonesia. This research focuses on how the role of Digital Leadership in supporting E-Court (Electronic Justice Services) from various obstacles The implementation of the system to answer these problems needs to use Bruce J. Avolio's Digital Leadership theory, Richard E. Inrajit's E-Government theory, and Richard Heeks' Design-Reality Gap model. This data was collected through a literature study and analyzed using a Qualitative Approach with a case study method. The results of the study show that the success of E-Court Implementation is not only determined by technological readiness, but also by the ability of leaders to build Digital Communication, utilize data and technology in Decision Making, and transform Digital Work Processes. Integration These three theories produce four main dimensions in Digital Leadership that contribute to increasing the effectiveness, efficiency, transparency, and accountability of electronic justice services. In this study, it can be concluded that strengthening digital leadership competencies is an important factor in supporting the transformation of e-government-based public services in Indonesia, although there are still challenges in the form of limited infrastructure, system disruptions, low digital literacy of the community, and apparatus competency gaps.

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.

Ardiansah, S., Kusuma, F. L., Anwar, M., & Novigawati, D. (2026). Digital leadership at the local government level: A case study of Diskominfo Tulungagung, 1(1), 63–70.

Avolio, B. J. (2002). Developing potential across a full range of leadership: Cases on transactional and transformational leadership. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S. S., & Dodge, G. E. (2000). E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 615–668.

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.

Baum, C., & Maio, A. D. (2000). Gartner's four phases of e-government model. Gartner Group.

Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & Goodin, R. E. (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford University Press.

Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25.

Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., & Zampieri, R. (2019). The role of leadership in a digitalized world: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1938. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938

Coursey, D., & Norris, D. F. (2008). Models of e-government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 547–560.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dwiyanto, A. (2011). Mengembalikan kepercayaan publik melalui reformasi birokrasi. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494.

Fauzi, F. (2025). Kepemimpinan digital dalam dunia pendidikan: Tinjauan systematic literature review. TA'LIM: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Islam, 8(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.52166/talim.v8i2.9433

Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press.

Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to research streams and research needs. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187–216.

Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36–44.

Hadi, I., & Widnyani, I. A. P. S. (2024). Modernisasi dan digitalisasi public service: Mewujudkan Indonesia Emas melalui harmonisasi Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE). Jurnal Kridatama Sains dan Teknologi, 6(2), 639–658. https://doi.org/10.53863/kst.v6i02.1398

Head, B. W. (2008). Three lenses of evidence-based policy. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(1), 1–11.

Heeks, R. (2003). Most eGovernment-for-development projects fail: How can risks be reduced? (iGovernment Working Paper No. 14). University of Manchester.

Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and managing eGovernment: An international text. SAGE Publications.

Hos, J. (2026). Transformasi tata kelola pelayanan publik dalam era digital: Tinjauan literatur sistematis metode PRISMA fundamental di seluruh penjuru dunia. [Nama jurnal belum dicantumkan].

Indrajit, R. E. (2002). Electronic government: Strategi pembangunan dan pengembangan sistem administrasi publik otomatis di Indonesia. Andi Offset.

Janssen, M., & van der Voort, H. (2016). Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 1–5.

Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation: Becoming a digitally mature enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press.

Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. (2020). Peraturan Menteri PANRB Nomor 59 Tahun 2020 tentang Tata Cara Evaluasi Penyelenggaraan Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik.

Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.

Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136.

Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 549–557.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 tentang Pelayanan Peradilan Berbasis Elektronik di Pengadilan.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Amandemen atas Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2020 tentang Amandemen atas Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2023). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik.

Maulidiya, J., Juliana, D., Eka Putri, R., Mustiraya, R., Nurtanio Bandung, U., & Pajajaran ICB Bandung, P. (2025). Kepemimpinan strategik dalam organisasi dan pemerintahan di era digital. Jurnal Manajemen & Bisnis, 1(1). https://ojs.forumkomunikasidosen.org/index.php/PROGRESA

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J., & Surjaman, T. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433.

Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.

Muljono, W. (2021). Kepemimpinan digital. Lembaga Administrasi Negara.

OECD. (2020). The OECD digital government policy framework: Six dimensions of a digital government. OECD Publishing.

Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Addison-Wesley.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Rahardjo, M. (2017). [Judul dan nama jurnal artikel studi kasus perlu dilengkapi].

Republic of Indonesia. (2003). Instruksi Presiden Nomor 3 Tahun 2003 tentang Kebijakan dan Strategi Nasional Pengembangan E-Government.

Republic of Indonesia. (2009a). Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik.

Republic of Indonesia. (2009b). Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Republic of Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik.

Rusdy, R. M. I. R., & Flambonita, S. (2023). Penerapan Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE) di pemerintah daerah untuk mewujudkan good governance. Lex LATA, 5(2), 218–239. https://doi.org/10.28946/lexl.v5i2.2351

Science, G., Program, S., Info, A., & Government, E. (2025). Advancing public service quality through Indonesia's electronic-based government system, 4(8), 902–911. https://doi.org/10.58471/esaprom.v4i08

Sintiya, E. S., Susanto, T. D., & Ningrum, A. C. P. (2021). Electronics-leadership (E-leadership) dalam sektor e-government: Literature review. Jurnal Nasional Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi, 6(3), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.25077/teknosi.v6i3.2020.158-168

Sumarwoto, S., Surya, A., & Nugroho, A. S. (2025). Implementasi E-Court dalam meningkatkan efisiensi proses peradilan (Studi kasus pada Pengadilan Agama Sragen). Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 3(1), 885–895. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v3i1.1027

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 354–369.

United Nations. (2024). United Nations e-government survey 2024: Accelerating digital transformation for sustainable development. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(1), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2018.07.003

Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 371–391.

West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27.

Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Review Press.

Wujarso, R., Pitoyo, B. S., & Prakoso, R. (2023). Peran kepemimpinan digital dalam era digital. Journal of Information System, Applied, Management, Accounting and Research, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.52362/jisamar.v7i1.720

Yamin, M. N., Sakawati, H., Rifdan, & Haerul. (2024). Analisis penerapan e-government dalam meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan publik di Kecamatan Tallo Kota Makassar. Jurnal Governance and Politik (JPG), 4, 49–61.

Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646–665.

Zhu, P. (2015). Digital master: Debunk the myths of enterprise digital maturity. Lulu Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

Noviani Puspitasari, Uyun Khoridah, Fanida Nur Rahmadiani, Eka Noviana Purwanti, & Anang Sugeng Cahyono. (2026). Implementation Of Digital Leadership on The Quality Of E-Government-Based Public Services in Indonesia. Journal of Social Governance and Public Administration (SOGPA), 1(2), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.68211/sogpa.v1i2.43

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.